Note:
Valve timing for the Dual Intake Engine
could not be maximized in the same way as the baseline engine. For in
the
case of maximum horsepower valve timing would favor the high pressure
air to a point where thermal efficiency became unexpectedly low. And in
the case of maximum thermal efficiency the low pressure air was favored
to a point that the engine power output became significantly lower than
the baseline engine.
It
is not real evident by the PV
diagram due to the scale, but it is true that the Dual Pressure Intake
Engine does not benefit from positive pumping work to the extent that
the baseline engine does. But why should useful work be "pumped"
back into and engine where some of that work is lost to friction?
Anyway
the dual intake engine has at
least 4 things going for it that on the balance make it a more
efficient engine.
1)
Due to the lower boost of the one
compressor, less of the work from the turbine will be consumed. And
since this engine's turbo shaft is connected to the crankshaft this
remaining work can be considered useful work.
2) The "low" pressure air will be coming in at a lower temperature
since it will have experienced less compression heating. So after the
"high" intake air enters the cylinder it will result in a higher
volumetric efficiency due to the fact the air will be denser due to the
lower temperature of this mix. This will improve indicated work by a
higher percentage than any increase in friction losses.
3) Also this low temperature mix will result in a lower maximum
temperature, reducing heat losses to the cylinder walls and thus
improving thermal efficiency.
4) This is not
accounted for in the simulation program. But it is thought that swirl
and turbulence of the intake air
should be greater at the time of combustion helping improve the
combustion efficiency and the burn rate. This high kinetic action
should occur since a higher portion of the induced air enters the
cylinder later in the cycle and at a higher velocity due to the high
pressure differential between the cylinder and intake manifold.
Importance
of Uniport Valve
In
the simulation for the baseline H
series engine the intake port area was equal to 22.47 in2.
In the dual
intake engine simulation there
was 19.87 in2 for the low pressure gas and 11.36 in2for
the high pressure gas. So, the dual pressure intake engine had 39% more
port areas than the baseline H-series engine.
So
though it is possible to have a dual
pressure intake engine without using a Uniport Valve it would reduce
the power rating of an engine significantly.
|